Peatland Action Scotland
| Project name | Peatland Action Scotland |
|---|---|
| Country of origin | Scotland |
| Original use | To restore degraded peatlands for climate, biodiversity, and water benefits |
| Lead organization | NatureScot (Scotland's nature agency) |
| Primary funding source | Scottish Government |
| Condition addressed | Degraded, drained, or eroded peatland |
| Restoration goal | Return peatland to a functioning, carbon-sequestering ecosystem |
Origin and history
Peatland Action Scotland is a national restoration funding and advisory programme originating in Scotland. It was created in the early 2010s as a direct response to the documented poor condition of the country's peatland ecosystems. The initiative emerged from growing scientific consensus on the critical role of peatlands in carbon sequestration and biodiversity. Its establishment followed increased governmental and public awareness of peatland degradation as a key environmental issue. The programme is administered by NatureScot, Scotland's national nature agency, drawing on decades of prior research and pilot projects. Its formation aligns with Scotland's broader climate change legislation and biodiversity targets set from the late 2000s onward.
What it is for
Peatland Action Scotland exists to restore degraded peatlands across Scotland to a healthy, functional state. Its primary purpose is to block drainage ditches, often called grips, to re-wet the peat and raise the water table. This re-wetting halts the oxidation of the peat, which is the process that releases stored carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. A secondary purpose is to re-vegetate bare peat surfaces, often through techniques like mulching and seeding with native species like sphagnum moss. The programme provides grant funding to land managers, including private estates, farmers, and non-governmental organisations, to undertake this restoration work. It also offers specialist technical advice and project management support to ensure restoration methods are applied correctly for specific site conditions.
Pros and cons
A significant pro of Peatland Action is its comprehensive, evidence-based approach, providing both funding and essential expertise that individual land managers often lack. The restoration work effectively reduces net greenhouse gas emissions, making it a tangible climate action, and can improve water quality by reducing dissolved organic carbon runoff. A clear con is the high initial cost and labour intensity of restoration, particularly in remote areas where machinery access is difficult. Some restoration techniques, such as using plastic piling to dam ditches, introduce non-biodegradable materials into the environment, which is a trade-off against long-term carbon benefits. Land managers sometimes regret involvement when restoration temporarily disrupts agricultural use or access, and a common mistake is underestimating the required ongoing monitoring and maintenance. In some cases, poorly planned ditch blocking can lead to localised flooding or erosion if water is not adequately managed, creating new problems.
Who it suits
This programme suits land managers who have areas of actively eroding or drained peatland and are committed to long-term environmental stewardship over immediate financial return. It is particularly suited to larger estates or organisations that can manage the scale of project administration and have the capacity to accommodate temporary disruption. Farmers or crofters with areas of degraded peat marginal for agriculture may find it suitable for converting unproductive land into a sustainable asset that provides future ecosystem service payments. It also suits conservation NGOs and public bodies, such as national park authorities or forestry services, seeking to meet statutory biodiversity and climate targets on the land they manage. The programme is less suited to land managers seeking quick, low-involvement income, as it requires active project management and a multi-year commitment to monitoring. It is also poorly suited to sites where the primary land use objective, such as intensive agriculture or commercial forestry, is fundamentally incompatible with a high water table.
Latest Peatland Action Scotland news
Latest reporting

UN climate chief warns against climate
UN climate chief Simon Stiell warns that political polarization over climate action risks economic disaster, as data confirms August 2026 tied as the

Finland's Isosuo peatland restoration joins European network
The Isosuo peatland restoration project in southern Finland has joined the European Rewilding Network, aiming to share knowledge and scale up...

Labour risks losing up to 50 seats to Greens over North Sea drilling approval
Internal Green party research suggests Labour could lose dozens of seats at the next election if the government approves new North Sea oil and gas...

Scotland’s Burryman procession: a living tradition of community and endurance
While the Edinburgh festival dominates headlines, a lesser-known but deeply rooted Scottish tradition-the Burryman procession-takes place nearby...